Public docket summary · 2025-TSOB-0100
This page orders the filings Collins released for publicity and extracts what they say. The appeal is pending. TSA has asked the Panel to dismiss it as untimely. Collins has asked the Panel to accept the appeal for good cause and to consider new evidence. This is a summary of the paper, not a court ruling.
TSA issued a Determination of Security Threat in 2021 and asked FAA to revoke Collins’s airman certificates. An Administrative Law Judge (Hon. Brian J. Curley, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ) later affirmed that determination in a Decision and Order dated May 30, 2024 (ALJ Docket 22-TSA-0105). Collins appealed to the Transportation Security Oversight Board. The TSOB docket is 2025-TSOB-0100.
FAA later acknowledged that Collins surrendered his commercial, remote, flight instructor, and ground instructor certificates (Case No. 2021AGC00047, letter dated May 6, 2026). He is not providing flight instruction.
Not legal advice. Official records remain with TSOB/TSA. Documents marked Sensitive Security Information (SSI) under 49 C.F.R. Parts 15 and 1520 are not posted here.
This PDF is the same attachment already published: TSA’s August 3, 2016 Interim Redress Procedures for FAA Certificate Holders – U.S. Citizens (how a Determination of Security Threat is issued, information exchange, ALJ review, TSOB review, and withdrawal). Download: 2025-12-tsa-exhibit-list-redress-procedures.pdf.
Public points from those procedures: TSA has the burden before the ALJ; the standard is preponderance of the evidence; either party may appeal an ALJ decision to TSOB within 60 days; TSA may withdraw a determination at any time, which would moot the TSOB appeal and cause FAA to withdraw its order.
This is the ALJ’s May 30, 2024 Decision and Order in 22-TSA-0105 — the file former counsel emailed on September 6, 2025 (Exhibit B). Every page is marked SSI. Federal rules forbid posting SSI to the public internet without TSA/DOT authorization. The full 28-page order is therefore not hosted on PilotRules.
Procedural facts already stated in TSA’s later public briefs, and confirmed by the caption of that order:
The order’s factual findings and analysis are SSI-marked and are not reproduced here. Collins’s TSOB appeal challenges whether that decision should stand and whether the appeal was timely; TSA asks that the appeal be dismissed as untimely.
Collins’s position (from his declaration, reply, and April 2026 memo): He did not receive the actual ALJ Decision until September 6, 2025, when former counsel emailed it. He then filed a TSOB appeal and asked the Panel to accept it despite the usual 60-day clock. He says there has been no recurrence of the 2021 conduct, that he has focused on education and compliance, and that ForeFlight logs appearing while he was in federal custody raise chain-of-custody questions about phone-derived evidence.
TSA’s position (from its Dec. 8, 2025 motion and Jan. 2, 2026 response): The 60-day appeal deadline is mandatory. Counsel was served the ALJ order on May 30, 2024. TSA says Collins has not shown due diligence or good cause for an ~18-month delay, that college coursework is not an excuse, and that rehabilitation evidence is outside the TSOB’s limited “substantial evidence” review. TSA asks the Panel to reject and summarily dismiss the appeal.
Where it stands: As of Collins’s later status inquiry, the Panel had not announced a decision on the untimely-appeal motion or the merits. His perfected appellant brief was filed March 17, 2026; the second supplemental memorandum was filed April 26, 2026.
| Date | Document | Who | What it says (extract) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar. 12, 2024 (eCFR copy as of Sept. 2, 2025) |
6 CFR Part 126 | DHS regulation | Rules for TSOB review. Notice of appeal is due within 60 days of the ALJ decision. Untimely appeals “must” be dismissed unless the Panel finds good cause. Appellant brief due 60 days after TSA files the record. Panel may affirm, modify, reverse, or remand. If TSA withdraws the threat determination, the appeal is moot. |
| May 30, 2024 | ALJ Decision and Order (SSI — not posted) | ALJ Curley, 22-TSA-0105 | AFFIRMED TSA’s Determination of Security Threat and certificate revocation. Served by email the same day on counsel (g.k.chambers@gmail.com). Marked SSI on every page; full PDF is not published. Filename later emailed to Collins: Decision and Order_250906_082500.pdf (Sept. 6, 2025). |
| Sept. 6, 2025 | Exhibit B | Geoffrey Chambers → Collins | Email (subject line OCR’d as “Alcohol order”) attaching “Decision and Order_250906_082500.pdf” (May 30, 2024 decision). Collins treats this as first receipt of the order itself. |
| On or about Nov. 2025 | Exhibit A — Supplemental Declaration | Ethan Jeffrey Collins | Declares he did not receive the ALJ order when issued; received it Sept. 6, 2025 after repeated requests; then acted to appeal. States no recurrence of similar 2021 conduct; focused on stability, education, and compliance. Includes a timeliness reply section arguing good cause under 6 CFR § 126.13(d). |
| Nov. 24, 2025 | TSOB instruction letter | Randall Kaplan, Docket Clerk | TSOB received Collins’s Notice of Appeal of the May 30, 2024 ALJ order, plus a Motion to Accept Untimely Notice of Appeal and consent to electronic service. Assigned 2025-TSOB-0100. Attached 6 CFR Part 126. TSA must file the administrative record within 30 days; Collins must then file an appellant brief within 60 days or the appeal may be dismissed. Serve TSOB_Docket@hq.dhs.gov and TSAOCCSTAO@tsa.dhs.gov. |
| Dec. 8, 2025 | TSA Motion Opposing Waiver of Timeliness | Judith A. Gomez, TSA Chief Counsel | Asks the Panel to deny a waiver and dismiss. Procedural history: DST March 23, 2021; Collins’s ALJ request July 23, 2022 (TSA waived that earlier delay); hearing May 2, 2023; ALJ order May 30, 2024; TSOB notice ~Nov. 24, 2025. Argues no good cause, service on counsel was enough, college is not an excuse, and this is a second long delay. |
| Dec. 2025 (attachment) | TSA exhibit / Interim Redress Procedures | TSA | August 3, 2016 “Interim Redress Procedures for FAA Certificate Holders – U.S. Citizens”: how a DST is issued, information exchange, ALJ review, and TSOB review. TSA may withdraw a determination at any time. |
| Jan. 2, 2026 | TSA Response to Respondent’s Reply Brief | TSA | Repeats request to dismiss. Says Collins still has not produced emails showing earlier requests for the order; notes he filed the TSOB appeal pro se and had TSA/ALJ contacts. Attaches May 30, 2024 service email from ALJ paralegal Nicole Mulmore to parties including Chambers. Argues rehabilitation and college courses are irrelevant to substantial-evidence review and to good cause. |
| Mar. 17, 2026 | Perfected appellant brief (referenced in Collins’s later status letter; not in this file set) | Collins | Filed to perfect the appeal after the record, per 6 CFR § 126.23. |
| Apr. 26, 2026 | Second Supplemental Memorandum | Collins | After supervised release ended, ForeFlight showed two tracks logged while he says he was in custody: Apr. 19, 2021 TIST (St. Thomas) toward ~24.96°N / 76.69°W; June 11, 2021 LTBJ (İzmir) toward Kayseri, Turkey. He argues background GPS logging requires a powered device and that this breaks chain of custody for phone-derived evidence used in the administrative record. Served TSA and TSOB by email. |
| May 6, 2026 | FAA letter (AGC-300) | Nicholas (Cole) R. Milliard | FAA received surrendered certificates. If TSA withdraws the security-threat determination, certificates (except expired medicals) would be returned. |
Collins’s April 26, 2026 memorandum attaches ForeFlight history showing three listed items, including a local KRXE entry on Jan. 31, 2021 and the two 2021 tracks he says occurred while he was incarcerated. The screenshot below is the image he provided with that filing.

Caption as Collins described it: LTBJ → 38.74°N/35.05°E (June 11, 2021); TIST → 24.96°N/76.69°W (April 19, 2021); KRXE → KRXE (January 31, 2021). TSA has not, in the documents published here, responded to this supplemental memorandum.
He is cooperating with a lawful appeal, publishing the other side’s briefs as well as his own, and documenting later education, civic training, and community letters elsewhere on this site. He is not asking readers to treat a pending motion as a win. He is asking them to read the timeline instead of leftover 2021 headlines about a different search snippet or a different person with the same name.
Accountability press release · Character references · Wrong-person disambiguation